Comments on: Saxton for “Governer”

By: Dan

Dan — Thu, 28 Sep 2006 05:25:57 +0000

The population of Portland and Eugene likely exceeds that of the rest of the state combined. We have five Democrats elected to represent us in D.C. and only two Republicans.

It’s obvious that conservatives are in the minority in Oregon.

By: Nick

Nick — Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:51:15 +0000

What this state needs is to give Portland to Washington. This is a conservative state except for Portland and that hellhole of a city Eugene.

By: Elliott

Elliott — Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:19:51 +0000

Here here, Commish. You’re right on! And thanks for the compliment. Or, as Saxton would write, “complement.”

By: Commish

Commish — Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:09:16 +0000

Right. All those years of “liberal abuse” by the Republican-controlled House and previously Republican-controlled Senate. Oregon is among states at the bottom of the list when it comes to total taxes paid. You get what you pay for.

It DOES matter that a man who is running on his educational credentials knows how to spell the name of the position he is seeking. It DOES matter that someone seeking a position of authority, oversight, and responsibility act accordingly by exercising some authority, oversight, and responsiblity in the expenditure of large sums of other people’s money when sending out thousands of glossy mailers.

Anyway, I love “putting the goober back in gubernatorial”! Very funny!

By: Elliott

Elliott — Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:59:01 +0000

Point noted.

By: JustaDog

JustaDog — Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:09:23 +0000

Somehow I don’t think he made up the signs.

Doesn’t really matter since I’d rather have a Gov. that will undo the damage of years of liberal abuse than a continuation of that abuse – and increased taxes!